Home » HARDWARE STORE

Review of Sigma 150-500mm OS

24 March 2009 3 Comments

When I was looking for a walkabout lens around the range of 80-400mm with image stabilizer, I had several choices. It was either the Sigma 120-400 OS, 150-500 OS or the Nikkor 80-400vr. After initial testing of the three lenses, I narrowed down to either the 150-500 OS or the Nikkor 80-400vr.

There were two factors that I deem as priorities for choosing the lens. First, sharpness wide open. Second, focus speed for flight/action.

In the store, I compared the two lenses with the Nikon D3 in the following areas.

  1. Focus speed (Sigma Wins)
  2. Sharpness (Tied – wide open)
  3. Colour (Nikon wins)
  4. Image stabilizing (Tied) (lowest speed tested being 1/160th)

Based on the above results, and of course, the price tag, I chose the Sigma. The Nikon costs about $1000 more than the Sigma.

Here are some results over the last month shooting with the Sigma 150-500f/5.6-6.3 HSM DG OS and Nikon D3/D300.

Nikon D3 + Sigma 150-500f/5.6-6.3 HSM DG OS
Picture 1(Scarlet backed flowerpecker)

Picture 2(Stork billed Kingfisher)

Nikon D300 + Sigma 150-500f/5.6-6.3 HSM DG OS

Picture 3

Picture 4

Disclaimer
The findings above are the sole experience of mine and the copy I possess and does not represent all the Sigma lenses in the market. As such, I expect results to differ.

3 Comments »

  • kennie said:

    i have to agree this lens is way sharp even wide open, provided u do with long lens technique. I used this lens for about 6months and it gave me really really sharp results. I under estimated this lens and when i first started using this lens for the first 2 weeks, all shots were blur, OOF, etc. Have to master long lens technique in oder to maximise this lens. This is value for money , for the 500mm reach, it is a kill. U will have to pay $7000 for the nikon equivalent.

    Only cons, Widest at f6.3 at 500mm and no limit switch. WIll have prefered the lens to be more solid when it totally extends out on 500mm.

    kennie

  • ForestWander Nature Photography said:

    I am thinking of trying this one out.

    Hope it works well on my new 5d Mark II

  • mojofuse said:

    Is the IQ better than the 120-400mm? thanks!

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Anti-Spam Quiz: